Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Objections raised on the Incomplete & Irrelevant Minutes of the Meeting held on 31.07.2014


F.No. AICEIA/Study Group/HRD/2014/13                       Date:01.09.2014                               
To
Shri Sanjai Srivastava,
The AAD (Policy),
DGHRD, Central Board of Excise & Customs,
409/8, Deep Shikha, Rajendra Place,
New Delhi-110 008.

         Sub: - Acute Stagnation in Group ‘B’ Executive grades:-Analysis of various options
                     available to address the problem - Reg.
*****
Sir, Please refer to the minutes of the meeting held on 31.07.2014 issued vide letter F.No.8/B/194/HRD (HRM)/2013/3091 dated 21.08.2014.

                In the said meeting dated 31.07.2014, we had submitted our representation vide letter F.No. AICEIA/Study Group/HRD/2014/09 dated 31.07.2014 (copy enclosed). During the meeting, all the suggestions mentioned in our representation were discussed in very clear and convincing manner and many of them were accepted and agreed upon but the same have not been incorporated in the said Minutes.  We repeatedly requested thorough our various letters and categorically requested in the meeting to give some interim relief/report and the same was agreed by the department side but we do not find the same in the said minutes.  Further, we also requested the Study Group many times vide our letters even no. 07 dated 15.07.2014 and 09 dated 31.07.2014 (copies enclosed) and also requested during the meeting to submit the recommendations of the study group before the implementation of the same before Cadre Restructuring is rolled out in CBEC and if CR is rolled out without following the recommendations of the Study Group, there will be no meaning of the Study Group.  The Study Group has been formed by the CBEC pursuant to AICEIA taking up the matter with Revenue Secretary, Govt. of India who subsequently directed CBEC to address the problem of stagnation and regional disparity. Since, the CR has been rolled out without even waiting the recommendations of the Study Group, there are chances that problems of stagnation & regional disparity do not get redressed this time.  Hence, the very essence, spirit and efforts of the authority to constitute the Study Group will suffer and there is no meaning of the Study Group.


We had also requested to draw a detailed minutes, in which all of our submissions along with the views/actions required from the department side should be incorporated whether they are possible or not.   If any of our points is not practical, the reason of its impracticality must be incorporated in the minuets.  By going through the said minutes, it is crystal clear that some of our points have not found any place in the said minutes whether the same was agreed upon or not. 

It has been noticed that the said minutes is incomplete and appears as more of a brief based on memory than minutes of the said meeting. It is quite evident from the fact that our submissions like not to change the residency period for Inspectors of Central Excise for promotion to the Grade of Superintendent of Central Excise have no reflection in the said minutes.  Hence, it is requested to draw a fresh Minutes of the meeting held on 31.07.2014 in the office of DGHRD, Saket, New Delhi with the following points (with detailed views of department on every points), which were already discussed during the meeting and presented in written also:-

1.    Filling up of vacancies of the post of Superintendents of Central Excise arising out of the ongoing Cadre Restructuring exercise in the CBEC must be done in a manner which permanently removes the disparities among the 15 Cadre Control Zones in promotions of Inspectors to the Superintendent of Central Excise.
2.    Seniority of Inspectors must be drawn on All India basis: - On 9.12.1996 Hon’ble Apex Court pronounced the judgement in case of Radhey Shyam Singh & Others Vs Union of India & Others and quashed the Zonal Selection Process and directed to Conduct the examinations on All India Basis and thereby make selection on the basis of All India Merit List.  Hence, an All India Seniority of Inspectors must be adopted effective 1996 before implementation of Cadre Restructuring, which is also mandated by the DoPT’s OM dated 1986 (copy enclosed).  Further, the following points are important while deciding All India Seniority of Inspectors:-
i.                     The first batch of Inspector so selected by SSC belongs to 1996, who were selected after Re-examination taken by SSC based on the above said judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and none of them have not got promotion in any zone, so far and thereby providing the hassle-free opportunity to the Board for implementing All India Seniority of Inspectors from 1996.
ii.                   CBEC had provided “All India Transfer Liability” to the Inspectors of Central Excise appointed on the basis of Combined Graduate Level Examination 2003, vide Board’s letter F.No. A. 32022/19/2008 - -Ad.III.A dated 19.11.2010 (copy enclosed). Accordingly, the OFFICE MEMORANDUM (appointment letter) issued to the Inspectors (CE) had been amended whereunder the Clause (xi) of the OFFICE MEMORANDUM (Appointment letter), as mentioned above, has been superseded by the following clause: - (xi) He/She is granted the provision of “All India Transfer Liability”.
iii.                  CBEC also provide “All India Transfer Liability” to the Inspectors of Central Excise appointed on the basis of SSC Graduate Level Examination, 2005 vide Board’s letter F. NO. A-12034/SSC/2/2008-AD.III(B) dated 28.07.2008 (copy enclosed).
iv.                 It is worthy to mention here that the above mentioned Terms & Conditions shall necessarily be treated as a part of their service condition and thereby a part of the Recruitment Rule for the said post, which has not been framed so far, in a long span of almost 12 Years.

v.                   It is to submit that, vide Board’s letter F. No. C 18013 /100 /2003   AD. III. B dated 24.10.2007, the post of Inspector (C. Ex.), Inspector ( P.O.), and Inspector ( Examiner)  under CBEC in the pay scale of  6500-10500 re-classified as Group ‘B’ Non- Gazetted w.e.f. 11.12.2003 but, no Recruitment Rule was made for the newly up-graded post of  Inspector (CE) (Gr. – B Non-gazetted), so far. The RR for the post of Inspector CE as Gr-B (NG) should have been made within 03 months in terms of DoPTs guidelines (Ref:-GUIDELINES ON FRAMING / AMENDMENT / RELAXATION OF RECRUITMENT RULES – issued by DOPT)

vi.                 The DoPT has also mandated the All India Seniority by way of deleting para 3.5 of the OM dated 03/07/1986 which provided the loss of seniority on Zonal Transfer. It was done by the DoPT vide OM dated 11.11.2010.

vii.                It is noteworthy to mention here that on the personnel policy matters, DoPT being nodal Department is required to be consulted by all administrative Ministries / Departments before issuing any instructions / guidelines relating to personnel policy matters of Central Government Employees. Thus, the OMs/guidelines issued by the DoPT may please be referred to, which legally and statutorily mandates the All India Seniority for the Inspectors CE, selected based on All India Merit list drawn by the selecting agency, i.e. SSC, in the light of Hon’ble Apex Court’s judgment dated 9/12/1996.

viii.              It is pertinent to quote here that Para 2.1 of D.O.P.T. O.M. Dated 03.07.1986 stipulates that in accordance with MHA O.M. No. 9/11/55-RPS Dated 22.12.59 “The relative seniority of all direct recruits is determined by the order of merit in which they are selected for such appointment on the recommendations of the UPSC or other selecting authority, persons appointed as a result of an earlier selection being senior to those appointed as a result of a subsequent selection”.
ix.                 From the same, it is quite clear that for all the direct recruits, selected by same exam, there has to be a single seniority list.  Also in the light of guidelines on Seniority Policy under DOPT’s O.M. No. 35014/2/80-Estt.(D) dated 7.2.1986 & O.M. No 22011/7/1986-Esstt. Dated 03/07/1986, no junior in selection made through ‘All-India-merit-list’ should be promoted before his/her senior of the same list. For the same, Seniority of Inspectors must be drawn on All India basis, effective 1996.
x.                   Promotion of any Inspector recruited under the All India Merit List, without taking into account of OMs/guidelines issued by the nodal Department may lead to flood of litigation and court cases all along.

In view of above, All India Seniority of Inspectors CE since 1996 batch (joined in 2003) is the only legitimate and judicious way out to eradicate intra-cadre disparity in promotion of Inspector CE to the post of Superintendent CE among different CCAs. This can easily be done by way of promoting all the Inspectors CE who belongs to Zonal-Selection process i.e. appointed prior to the above said judgement and for the All India Selection batches, All India Seniority can be done, without creating any administrative and statutory/legal crisis.

3.                   Suggestions on the Revision of Recruitment Rules of Superintendent of Central Excise and IRS (C&CE) was sent vide Association’s letter Ref. No. AICEIA/CBEC/RR/2014 dated 11.02.2014 (copy enclosed) should be considered before implementation of Cadre Restructuring.  The key point of the suggestions on revision of RR of IRS (C&CE) are as under, for ready reference:-
i.                     To address the regional disparity in promotion- The seniority of the officers in the eligibility list (for promotion to IRS) shall be prepared on the basis of combine length of service in the grades of Inspector of Central Excise and Superintendent of Central Excise or Inspectors and District Opium Officers/Intelligence Officers/Superintendent (Executive) in the Narcotics Department.  Since, the issue of stagnation is exceptional among all service, to check this issue exceptional remedies are needed.
ii.                   To improve the number of vacancies available for promotion at the lowest functional level of IRS (C&CE) and addressing the problem of Stagnation-Twenty five percent of vacancies in the Grade of Assistant Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise shall be filled by direct recruitment and seventy five percent of the vacancies shall be filled by promotion.  This is in line with the recruitment rule of India Postal Service and would increase the promotion prospects of Group-B cadres due to increase in the number of posts to be filled by promotion, as well as protect the direct recruits from stagnation.
4.                   A new organized service be created under the CBEC, for a start even with just Group “B” executives as part of it, if it is not considered possible immediately with Group “A” posts also in the new service to tap the vast pool of skilled and specialized work force available in the CBEC and to ensure time-bound promotions to these cadres also.
5.                   Promotion of all Inspectors, who have completed eight years of service: - We seek upgradation as Superintendent of Central Excise of all Inspectors in the country who have completed eight years of service.  This measure will not entail any significant burden on the exchequer since in any case Inspectors get entitled for salary of a Superintendent by way of MACPS on completion of 10 years of service.  As far as functional issues are concern, it is an undeniable fact that in almost all formations of the department there is practically no difference in the work of a Superintendent and Inspectors of Central Excise.  It is also pertinent to mention that in 1996-97, an upgradation of Inspectors to Superintendents was done with the sole purpose of mitigating the condition of stagnation obtaining then, which wasn’t as grave as it is today.  The copy of Board’s letter dated 10.09.1996 is enclosed herewith.
6.                   Merger/Unification of three Group “B” Executive Non-gazetted cadres into one cadre: -   The Director General (HRD), Customs & Central Excise also recommended the same saying that this is the most feasible option, as it has the potential to end forever the problem of inter-cadre disparities in promotional avenues in the said Inspector grade cadres [Copy of letter dated 07.05.2014 issued by the ADG (HRM) enclosed]. Letters submitted by this Association bearing F. No. AICEIA/Merger/HRD/2012/03 dated 19.05.2014 and even no. 02 dated 12.05.2014 is very germane to the issue at hand and the copies of the same are enclosed herewith for consideration accordingly.
7.                   Immediate scraping of any move to reduce Residency Period for promotion of Inspectors to the grade of Superintendents of Central Excise before All India Seniority for Inspector is brought in and all regional disparities in promotions within the cadre eliminated permanently.
In view of the above, it is requested to draw a fresh Minutes of the said meeting with the details views of the department on each and every point, as discussed in the said meeting.  Further, it is also to intimate that we have not received the minutes of the meeting held on 19.05.2014 in the office of DGHRD despite our several requests vide letters  F. No. AICEIA/Merger/HRD/2012/04 dated 12.06.2014, AICEIA/Merger/HRD/2014/05 dated 15.07.2014 and letter no. 06 dated 15.07.2014 (copies enclosed).  Hence, we are not sure if any committee/study Group is willing to solve the issues of regional disparity and stagnation or not.  However, we once again request you to redraw the Minutes of the meeting held on 31.07.2014 keeping in view all the points submitted during the said meeting and provide the Minutes of the meeting held on 19.05.2014.
Thanking you.       
                           Encl. As above (Thirteen sheets)                          
Yours faithfully,


(Abhishek Kamal)
Secretary General
Copy for information to:-
  1. The Revenue Secretary, Govt. of India, North Block, New Delhi.
  2. The Chairperson, CBEC, North Blok, New Delhi.
  3. The Additional Director General, Center of Excellence, NACEN, 3rd Floor, Tower-3 & 4, NBCC Plaza, Sector-5, Pushp Vihar, Saket, New Delhi- 110 017.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         (Abhishek Kamal)
Secretary General

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Regional Disparities in Promotions of Central Excise Inspectors to Superintendents


As the CBEC has started the implementation of Cadre Restructuring without taking care of regional disparity in promotion to the grade of Superintendent, it is high time to fight for our genuine demands.  We are not opposing Cadre Restructuring as a whole but CR will not be acceptable to us when it does not address regional disparity among 15 Cadre Controlling Authority and stagnation in the Cadre.  In view of the above, a meeting of all Office-Bearers of the National Body of the AICEIA has been fixed on 06.09.2014 at New Delhi to discuss the problem and our line of action.  You are, therefore, requested to send your views on the matter.  Meanwhile, some correspondences have been made with the Chairperson, CBEC and Hon'ble Minister of State for Finance, Govt. of India on 20.08.2014, copy of the same are reproduced on the blog:-








Letter to Hon'ble MOS (Finance)


F.No. AICEIA/CBEC/CR/2014/12                         Date:20.08.2014                               

To
The Hon’ble Minister of State for Finance,
Government of India,
North Block,
New Delhi-110001.


Sub: -Cadre Restructuring – Regional Disparities in Promotions of Central Excise Inspectors to
 Superintendents – Extreme Disappointment of Cadre at Continuing Grave Injustice.


Madam,

            Please refer to Association’s letters AICEIA/CBEC/2014 dated 18.06.2014 and F.No. AICEIA/CBEC/CR/2014/10 dated 05.08.2014 on above subject.

            In this regard, the following points are submitted for favor of kind attention and consideration please:-

                 1.  Inspectors of Central Excise, having Sanctioned Strength of 17749 (excluding SEZ) [new sanctioned strength after Cadre Restructuring is 20638], forms the largest and most important nervous system of the indirect tax administration headed by CBEC, is unfortunately also the most deprived in respect of prospects for career advancement.

                     2. This cadre is extremely demoralized and agitated because of their poor promotional prospects.  The majority of the Officers recruited as Inspectors have to retire as Superintendents of Central Excise with just one promotion in their entire career of 35-38 years.

                      3.   Such poor promotional avenues is totally contrary to the promotional prospects of  the cadres of Inspectors of Income Tax, Preventive Officer, Examiners and Assistant in Central Secretariat Service who are recruited through the same common examination conducted by the Staff Selection Commission but who get 3/4/5 promotions.

                      4. This cadre is facing huge regional disparities in promotions among the 15 Cadre Control Zones.  Inspectors joined in the year 1989 in Shillong Zone, 1992-1995 in Mumbai, Rajasthan, Lucknow, Bhopal, Kolkata, Chennai etc. are yet to get their first promotion whereas in Delhi, Bhubaneshwar etc. Inspectors joined in the year 2002 are getting promotion to the grade of Superintendent. It causes irreparable damage to the Department as whole by way of increasing humiliation and demoralization among the major work-force of the CBEC i.e.  Inspectors Central Excise. 

                      5. CBEC notified the allocation of personnel to various formations as part of the CR exercise vide F.No. A 11019/08/2013-AD. IV dated 01.08.2014 without first resolving the issues of regional disparities in promotions of Inspectors to the Superintendent of Central Excise.  It is also pertinent to mention here that the most stagnated zones have got few posts of Superintendent  e.g. Shillong approx. 46 posts, Cochin 10 posts, Kolkata 25 posts, Lucknow 105 posts, Jaipur 137 posts etc. whereas the Inspectors of 1989 to 1995 are yet to get their first promotion. If the posts of Superintendent vacated by way of promotion to the grade of Assistant Commissioner will also be counted, the problem of stagnation will continue to haunt the Inspectors of these stagnated zones.  In better placed zones like Delhi and Bhubaneshwar where Inspectors of 2002 are already getting promotions have got approx. 850 posts and 147 posts respectively.  These figures clearly indicate that the regional disparity will increase with greater degree after Cadre Restructuring if we do not address it this time.

The remedial actions to eradicate stagnation, regional disparity, poor promotional avenues etc. were submitted time to time by the AICEIA to the Board and were also intimated vide our letter Ref. No. AICEIA/CBEC/Prom Disparities/2014 dated 10.02.2014, AICEIA/Admin/2014/02 dated 09.07.2014, AICEIA/Merger.HRD/2014/06 dated 15.07.2014, AICEIA/CBEC/Resolutions/2014 dated 23.07.2014 and AICEIA/CBEC/CR/2014/10 dated 05.08.2014 (copies enclosed).  We, hereby, submit some remedial actions (in brief) to eradicate regional disparity in promotion for your kind perusal, and appropriate directions to the CBEC for implementation of the same before Cadre Restructuring are implemented in the CBEC:-

1.   Filling up of vacancies of the post of Superintendents of Central Excise arising out of the ongoing Cadre Restructuring exercise in the CBEC must be done in a manner which permanently removes the disparities among the 15 Cadre Control Zones in promotions of Inspectors to the Superintendent of Central Excise.

2.      Seniority of Inspectors must be drawn on All India basis: - On 9.12.1996 Hon’ble Apex Court pronounced the judgment in case of Radhey Shyam Singh & Others Vs Union of India & Others and quashed the Zonal Selection Process and directed to Conduct the examinations on All India Basis and thereby make selection on the basis of All India Merit List.  Hence, an All India Seniority of Inspectors must be adopted effective 1996 before implementation of Cadre Restructuring, which is also mandated by the DoPT’s OM dated 1986.  in the light of guidelines on Seniority Policy under DOPT’s O.M. No. 35014/2/80-Estt.(D) dated 7.2.1986 & O.M. No 22011/7/1986-Esstt. Dated 03/07/1986, no junior in selection made through ‘All-India-merit-list’ should be promoted before his/her senior of the same list. For the same, Seniority of Inspectors must be drawn on All India basis.   All India Seniority of Inspectors CE since 1996 batch (joined in 2003) is the only legitimate and judicious way out to eradicate intra-cadre disparity in promotion of Inspector CE to the post of Superintendent CE among different CCAs. This can easily be done by way of promoting all the Inspectors CE who belongs to Zonal-Selection process i.e. appointed prior to the above said judgment and for the All India Selection batches, All India Seniority can be done, without creating any administrative and statutory/legal crisis.

It is also to submit that if Cadre Restructuring in CBEC is attempted to be implemented without addressing the acute stagnation and huge disparity in promotions from Inspectors to Superintendents of Central Excise across different Zones, the problems will only aggravate further. If the junior Inspectors from better placed Zones are promoted ahead of their seniors from badly stagnating Zones while filling up thousands of vacancies in the grade of Superintendents of Central Excise arising out of Cadre Restructuring, may lead to flood of litigation and court cases all along.  Hence, it is matter of prime importance to address the genuine grievance of the cadre and avoid any future suffering of Inspectors.

It is, therefore, requested to kindly intervene into the matter to prevail justice to the largest cadre of the CBEC.

Thanking you.       

Encl. As above (Thirteen sheets)                                                                    


Yours faithfully,

(Abhishek Kamal)
Secretary General



Letter to Chairperson, CBEC



F.No. AICEIA/CBEC/CR/2014/11                                       Date: 20.08.2014


To
The Chairperson,
Central Board of Excise & Customs,

North Block, New Delhi-1.





                     
Sub: -Cadre Restructuring – Regional Disparities in Promotions of Central Excise Inspectors to 
Superintendents – Extreme Disappointment of Cadre at Continuing Grave Injustice.






Madam,
                 Please refer to Association’s letter F. No. AICEIA/CBEC/CR/2014/10 dated 05.08.2014 on above subject.

            In context to our above mentioned letter, this Association once again invites your kind attention to our demands, we have been raising repeatedly and insistently i.e. to address the regional disparity in promotion of Inspectors of Central Excise to the grade of Superintendent of Central Excise among 15 Cadre Controlling Zones of Central Excise.  In our above mentioned letter dated 05.08.2014 (copy enclosed), we have submitted all important correspondences related to redressal of zonal disparities in promotion to the grade of the Superintendent.

      A study Group hasp recently been formed vide DGHRD letter F.No. 8/B/194/HRD (HRM)/2013 dated 04.07.2014 to study acute stagnation, intra/inter cadre disparity in promotion in Group-B Executive Grades.  Its first meeting held on 31.07.2014 and the committee has not completed its study on the subject and the Board has rolled out the implementation of CR without taking consideration of regional disparity and the report of the study group.  If promotion will be given to any junior Inspector posted at well placed zone before their seniors posted at stagnated zone without implementation of All India Seniority, there will be no meaning of the Study Group.  It is high time to get away of regional disparity when we have a large numbers of post of Superintendent in hand.   


        In view of the above, it is once again requested that the vacancies in the grade of Superintendents allocated to various zones should be filled only in the manner that Senior Inspectors from any zones should be promoted ahead of Inspectors who are junior to them from any other zone, which will at least enable their seniority in the lower cadre to be protected when seniority as Superintendents is reckoned, which as per extant provisions is on an All India basis, and the date of joining as Superintendent is the criterion for determining inter-se seniority of Superintendents.  In the light of guidelines on Seniority Policy under DOPT’s O.M. No. 35014/2/80-Estt.(D) dated 7.2.1986 & O.M. No 22011/7/1986-Esstt. Dated 03/07/1986, no junior in selection made through ‘All-India-merit-list’ should be promoted before his/her senior of the same list.  For the same, Seniority of Inspectors must be drawn on All India basis.   All India Seniority of Inspectors CE since 1996 batch (joined in 2003) is the only legitimate and judicious way out to eradicate intra-cadre disparity in promotion of Inspector CE to the post of Superintendent CE among different CCAs. This can easily be done by way of promoting all the Inspectors of Central Excise who belongs to Zonal-Selection process i.e. appointed prior to the above said judgment and for the All India Selection batches, All India Seniority can be done, without creating any administrative and statutory/legal crisis.




                 This Association has continuously been pointed out its concerns in all written and oral submissions before the office side.  As a responsible recognized Service Association, we extended out full co-operation by way of supporting all types of solutions to solve the critical problems of this cadre but for seer dismay to this cadre the office side has no space for the points raised by the staff side as they unilaterally went ahead with the way they wish.  At this juncture, the members of this cadre are forced to ponder that whether the Board
considers this cadre as part of the department or not.  So, it is our responsibility to once again convey you that disappointed and demoralized cadre will never be good for any administration and non-redressal of the acute disparity in promotion will make members more agitated.



Madam, in order to achieve better results for our country, it is necessary to build a great organization with committed & dedicated work force.  For making that type of organization, effective redressal of grievances of largest work force of CBEC i.e. Inspector Cadre is essential pre-requisite.  Hence, it is once again requested to give an appointment at your earliest convenience so that we may present our concerns before you in person and suggest workable solutions to the problems, Cadre is facing. 

Thanking you.       
 Encl. As above (Two sheets)                          
Yours faithfully,

(Abhishek Kamal)
Secretary General
Copy submitted to:-

1.      The Hon’ble Union Minister of State for Finance, North Block, New Delhi with a request for an appropriate intervention in the matter.
2.      The Revenue Secretary, Govt. of India, North Block, New Delhi.

(Abhishek Kamal)
Secretary General












Friday, August 15, 2014

Co-Ordination Meeting of All Office Bearers of the National Body of AICEIA at New Delhi


It is to intimate that, with the agenda to review recent developments, to invite suggestions for better functioning of the Association and to chalk out the future course of action in view of the CBEC’s unilateral announcement of formations & staff strength to further the restructuring process without adhering to the views offered by this Association time & again, a Co-Ordination Meeting of all Office-Bearers of the National Body of the AICEIA was fixed on 16 & 17.08.2014 at New Delhi. However, some of our Office-Bearers, citing various reasons, expressed their inability in attending the Meeting on the said dates and suggested for some future dates. Taking into consideration their genuine requests, the Co-Ordination Meeting has been re-scheduled on September 6th 2014 at New Delhi. So, all office bearers of the National Body are hereby requested to attend the same, so as to make this Association more strong & participatory to handle the challenges.  The venue of the meeting will be intimated in due course.

With best wishes on the 68th Independence Day.

Yours fraternally,
Abhishek Kamal
Secretary General




Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Cadre Restructuring – Regional Disparities in Promotions of Central Excise Inspectors to Superintendents – Extreme Disappointment of Cadre at Continuing Grave Injustice


At last much awaited Cadre Restructuring of CBEC has finally taken a shape vide letter vide                F No. A 11019/08/2013 –Ad. IV dated 01.08.2014, though it serves little to ease out the stagnation of most stagnated zones and there is nothing to address regional disparity. In fact, it will create great gap between most stagnated and less stagnated zones. One of our key demands i.e. All India Seniority has also not been addressed though DGHRD and the Study Group have conceded to this demand in the meeting on 31.07.2014. We have been continuously presenting our view and discussing our points to eradicate Regional Disparity and Stagnation with CBEC, DGHRD and different Committees/Study Groups etc.  Even during our last meeting with the Study Group on Stagnation on 31.07.2014, we presented our detailed views on Regional Disparity and measures to address the problem of Stagnation and no such measures have been implemented before the CR.  Board has made a great joke to many stagnated zones by way of giving 7, 25, 46, 86 etc. posts of the Superintendent, which will not even promote the Inspectors of 1992, 1994 etc.

AICEIA strongly protests such mentality which deprives Inspectors from their basic rights.  At present, we are thinking on all possible ways to bring justice for our cadre and your views and supports are highly solicited. Today a letter has been written to the Chairperson, CBEC with copies to the Union Minister of State for Finance and the Revenue Secretary, Govt. of India, which is reproduced as under:-

F.No. AICEIA/CBEC/CR/2014/10                                     Date:05.08.2014                                

To
The Chairperson,
Central Board of Excise & Customs,
North Block, New Delhi-1.

Sub: - Cadre Restructuring – Regional Disparities in Promotions of Central Excise      Inspectors to Superintendents – Extreme Disappointment of Cadre at Continuing Grave Injustice. 
Madam,
It is with deep anguish that we write today to lodge this Association’s strongest possible protest on the CBEC notifying allocation of personnel to various formations as part of the CR exercise (vide F No. A 11019/08/2013 –Ad. IV dated 01.08.2014) without first resolving the issue of regional disparities in promotions of Inspectors to Superintendents of Central Excise.  Available information indicates that the said disparities would continue to fester acutely for long even in the post-restructuring period.
 If the CBEC has devised any plans for filling up the posts of Superintendents in a manner that eliminates the said disparities, it is requested that the same may kindly be made known to us also - to this cadre which has been anxiously waiting for some news on this front for several years now, but getting only repeated empty assurances from the highest echelons of the Board that the same will be addressed in course of CR.  From what has been put out in this regard on the public domain, we are unable to discern any measure which will result in doing away with the said disparities.

The members of this Association are highly agitated and dismayed at the continued neglect of this cadre’s burning issues, and the callous manner in which a great opportunity (Cadre Restructuring) to genuinely resolve at least partially some of their problems looks like being frittered away by the select few in the CBEC in their unseemly hurry to ensure immediate and huge benefits to their own kind.
 We can only conclude from the recent developments that the prolonged or rather endless consultations with this Association by many specially appointed bodies and Study Groups and Committees that has been going on at the CBEC’s instance is farcical, and meant only to facilitate a convenient reply to the Ministry that the problem of Inspectors of Central Excise are being addressed in consultation with the Association representing them.

         We request you to immediately order that vacancies in the cadre of Superintendents allocated to various Zones should be filled only in the manner that senior Inspectors from any Zone should be promoted ahead of Inspectors who are junior to them from any (other) Zone, which will at least enable their seniority in the lower cadre to beprotected when  seniority as Superintendents is  reckoned, which as per extant provisions is on an All India basis, and the date of joining as Superintendent is the criterion for determining inter-se seniority of Superintendents.  Further, it is also requested that before implementation of this Cadre Restructuring, All India Seniority regime for Inspectors from 1996-batch (joined in 2003) must be brought in order to bring justice in the cadre.  It is indeed unfortunate that even after this issue was represented so many times, no action has apparently been taken on the same, despite definite directions having been issued to the Board by the Revenue Secretary, Govt. of India also in this regard.    

Copies of certain important earlier correspondence, bearing reference nos. as listed hereunder, in this regard, are enclosed for ready reference: -

11.   OSD/ MPV/Inspector Assoc.  dated 22.03.2013 issued by Member(P&V), CBEC
22.   Nil dated 28.03.2013 issued by ADG (HRM) DGHRD , CBEC
33.  AICEIA/Prom Disparities/2014 dated 10.02.2014 submitted by this Association
44.   AICEIA/CBEC/RR/2014 dated 11.02.2014 submitted by this Association
55.  AICEIA/Regional Disparities/ 2013  dated 17.12.2013  submitted by this Association
66.  AICEIA/CBEC/2012/ UPGRADATION dated 26.06.2013 submitted by this Association
77.  AICEIA/Admin/2014/02 dated 09.07.2014 submitted by this Association
88.  AICEIA/Merger.HRD/2014/06 dated 15.07.2014 submitted by this Association
99.  AICEIA/CBEC/Resolutions/2014 dated 23.07.2014 submitted by this Assocation
                           
Madam, we are also very disappointed that despite our pursuing with your office several times, we have not been granted an audience by you, and we once again request that we may be given an appointment at your earliest convenience so that we may present the cadre’s grave concerns before you in person and also suggest workable solutions to those.

Encl. As above.
Yours faithfully,

(Abhishek Kamal)
Secretary General
Copy submitted to:-
11.  The Hon’ble Union Minister of State for Finance, North Block, New Delhi w.r.t letter No. AICEIA/CBEC/2014  dated 18.06.2014 submitted to her when office bearers of this Association met her, with a request for an appropriate intervention in the matter.
22.  The Revenue Secretary, Govt. of India, North Block, New Delhi, w.r.t letter No. AICEIA/RS/2013 dated 25.04.2014 submitted by office bearers of this Association when they met him, with a request for an appropriate intervention in the matter.

(Abhishek Kamal)
Secretary General